Google DeepMind has unveiled a new research paper today, introducing "AlphaEvolve" (1), a coding agent that leverages evolutionary computation. It's already garnering significant attention due to its broad applicability and proven successes, such as discovering more efficient methods for matrix calculations in mathematics and improving efficiency in Google's data centers. Let's dive a little deeper into what makes it so remarkable.

LLMs Empowered with Evolutionary Computation

In a nutshell, "AlphaEvolve" can be described as an "agent that leverages LLMs to the fullest to evolve code." To briefly touch upon "evolutionary computation," it's an algorithm that mimics the process of evolution in humans and living organisms to improve systems, replicating genetic crossover and mutation on a computer. Traditionally, the function responsible for this, called an "Operator," had to be set by humans. "AlphaEvolve" automates the creation of Operators with the support of LLMs, enabling more efficient code generation. That sounds incredibly powerful! While evolutionary computation itself isn't new, with practical applications dating back to the 2000s, its combination with LLMs appears to have unlocked new capabilities. The red box in the diagram below indicates where evolutionary computation is applied.

2. Continued Evolution with Meta-Prompts

I'm particularly intrigued by the "prompt_sampler" mentioned above because this is where "meta-prompts" are executed. The paper explains, "Meta prompt evolution: instructions and context suggested by the LLM itself in an additional prompt-generation step, co-evolved in a separate database analogous to the solution programs." It seems that prompts are also evolving! The diagram below also shows that accuracy decreases when meta-prompt evolution is not applied compared to when it is.

This is incredible! With an algorithm like this, I'd certainly want to apply it to my own tasks.

3. Have We Taken a Step Closer to an Intelligence Explosion?

Approximately a year ago, researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner published a paper (2) predicting that computers would surpass human performance by 2030 as a result of an intelligence explosion. The graph below illustrates this projection. This latest "AlphaEvolve" can be seen as having acquired the ability to improve its own performance. This might just be a step closer to an intelligence explosion. It's hard to imagine the outcome of countless AI agents like this, each evolving independently, but it certainly feels like something monumental is on the horizon. After all, computers operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, so once they acquire self-improvement capabilities, their pace of evolution is likely to accelerate. He refers to this as "recursive self-improvement" (p47).

What are your thoughts? The idea of AI surpassing humans can be a bit challenging to grasp intuitively, but just thinking about what AI agents might be like around 2027 is incredibly exciting. I'll be sure to provide updates if a sequel to "AlphaEvolve" is released in the future. That's all for now. Stay tuned!

1) AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discovery Alexander Novikov* , Ngân Vu˜ * , Marvin Eisenberger* , Emilien Dupont* , Po-Sen Huang* , Adam Zsolt Wagner* , Sergey Shirobokov* , Borislav Kozlovskii* , Francisco J. R. Ruiz, Abbas Mehrabian, M. Pawan Kumar, Abigail See, Swarat Chaudhuri, George Holland, Alex Davies, Sebastian Nowozin, Pushmeet Kohli and Matej Balog* Google DeepMind ,16 May, 2025

2) S I T U AT I O N A L AWA R E N E S S The Decade Ahead, Leopold Aschenbrenner, June 2024

Notice: ToshiStats Co., Ltd. and I do not accept any responsibility or liability for loss or damage occasioned to any person or property through using materials, instructions, methods, algorithms or ideas contained herein, or acting or refraining from acting as a result of such use. ToshiStats Co., Ltd. and I expressly disclaim all implied warranties, including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. There will be no duty on ToshiStats Co., Ltd. and me to correct any errors or defects in the codes, the software and the contents.