The Cutting Edge of Prompt Engineering: A Look at Silicon Valley Startup

Hello everyone. How often do you find yourselves writing prompts? I imagine more and more of you are writing them daily and conversing with generative AI. So today, we're going to look at the state of cutting-edge prompt engineering, using a case study from a Silicon Valley startup. Let's get started.

1. "Parahelp," a Customer Support AI Startup

There's a startup in Silicon Valley called "Parahelp" that provides AI-powered customer support. Impressively, they have publicly shared some of their internally developed prompt know-how (1). In the hyper-competitive world of AI startups, I want to thank the Parahelp management team for generously sharing their valuable knowledge to help those who come after them. The details are in the link below for you to review, but my key takeaway from their know-how is this: "The time spent writing the prompt itself isn't long, but what's crucial is dedicating time to the continuous process of executing, evaluating, and improving that prompt."

When we write prompts in a chat, we often want an immediate answer and tend to aim for "100% quality on the first try." However, it seems the style in cutting-edge prompt engineering is to meticulously refine a prompt through numerous revisions. For an AI startup to earn its clients' trust, this expertise is essential and may very well be the source of its competitive advantage. I believe "iteration" is the key for prompts as well.

2. Prompts That Look Like a Computer Program

Let's take a look at a portion of the published prompt. This is a prompt for an AI agent to behave as a manager, and even this is only about half of the full version.

structures of prompts

Here is my analysis of the prompt above:

• Assigning a persona (in this case, the role of a manager)

• Describing tasks clearly and specifically

• Listing detailed, numbered instructions

• Providing important points as context

• Defining the output format

I felt it adheres to the fundamental structure of a good prompt. Perhaps because it has been forged in the fierce competition of Silicon Valley, it is written with incredible precision. There's still more to it, so if you're interested, please view it from the link. It's written in even finer detail, and with its heavy use of XML tags, you could almost mistake it for a computer program. Incredible!

3. The Future of Prompt Engineering

I imagine that committing this much time and cost to prompt engineering is a high hurdle for the average business person. After learning the basics of prompt writing, many people struggle with what the next step should be.

One tip is to take a prompt you've written and feed it back to the generative AI with the task, "Please improve this prompt." This is called a "meta-prompt." Of course, the challenges of how to give instructions and how to evaluate the results still remain. At Toshi Stats, we plan to explore meta-prompts further.

So, what did you think? Even the simple term "prompt" has a lot of depth, doesn't it?As generative AI continues to evolve, or as methods for creating multi-AI agents advance, I believe prompt engineering itself will also continue to evolve. It's definitely something to keep an eye on. I plan to provide an update on this topic in the near future.

That's all for today. Stay tuned!

ToshiStats Co., Ltd. offers various AI-related services. Please check them out here!

Copyright © 2025 Toshifumi Kuga. All rights reserved.

1. Prompt design at Parahelp, Parahelp, May 28, 2025

Notice: ToshiStats Co., Ltd. and I do not accept any responsibility or liability for loss or damage occasioned to any person or property through using materials, instructions, methods, algorithms or ideas contained herein, or acting or refraining from acting as a result of such use. ToshiStats Co., Ltd. and I expressly disclaim all implied warranties, including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. There will be no duty on ToshiStats Co., Ltd. and me to correct any errors or defects in the codes and the software.

Google DeepMind Announces "AlphaEvolve," Hinting at an Intelligence Explosion!

Google DeepMind has unveiled a new research paper today, introducing "AlphaEvolve" (1), a coding agent that leverages evolutionary computation. It's already garnering significant attention due to its broad applicability and proven successes, such as discovering more efficient methods for matrix calculations in mathematics and improving efficiency in Google's data centers. Let's dive a little deeper into what makes it so remarkable.

LLMs Empowered with Evolutionary Computation

In a nutshell, "AlphaEvolve" can be described as an "agent that leverages LLMs to the fullest to evolve code." To briefly touch upon "evolutionary computation," it's an algorithm that mimics the process of evolution in humans and living organisms to improve systems, replicating genetic crossover and mutation on a computer. Traditionally, the function responsible for this, called an "Operator," had to be set by humans. "AlphaEvolve" automates the creation of Operators with the support of LLMs, enabling more efficient code generation. That sounds incredibly powerful! While evolutionary computation itself isn't new, with practical applications dating back to the 2000s, its combination with LLMs appears to have unlocked new capabilities. The red box in the diagram below indicates where evolutionary computation is applied.

2. Continued Evolution with Meta-Prompts

I'm particularly intrigued by the "prompt_sampler" mentioned above because this is where "meta-prompts" are executed. The paper explains, "Meta prompt evolution: instructions and context suggested by the LLM itself in an additional prompt-generation step, co-evolved in a separate database analogous to the solution programs." It seems that prompts are also evolving! The diagram below also shows that accuracy decreases when meta-prompt evolution is not applied compared to when it is.

This is incredible! With an algorithm like this, I'd certainly want to apply it to my own tasks.

3. Have We Taken a Step Closer to an Intelligence Explosion?

Approximately a year ago, researcher Leopold Aschenbrenner published a paper (2) predicting that computers would surpass human performance by 2030 as a result of an intelligence explosion. The graph below illustrates this projection. This latest "AlphaEvolve" can be seen as having acquired the ability to improve its own performance. This might just be a step closer to an intelligence explosion. It's hard to imagine the outcome of countless AI agents like this, each evolving independently, but it certainly feels like something monumental is on the horizon. After all, computers operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, so once they acquire self-improvement capabilities, their pace of evolution is likely to accelerate. He refers to this as "recursive self-improvement" (p47).

What are your thoughts? The idea of AI surpassing humans can be a bit challenging to grasp intuitively, but just thinking about what AI agents might be like around 2027 is incredibly exciting. I'll be sure to provide updates if a sequel to "AlphaEvolve" is released in the future. That's all for now. Stay tuned!

1) AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discovery Alexander Novikov* , Ngân Vu˜ * , Marvin Eisenberger* , Emilien Dupont* , Po-Sen Huang* , Adam Zsolt Wagner* , Sergey Shirobokov* , Borislav Kozlovskii* , Francisco J. R. Ruiz, Abbas Mehrabian, M. Pawan Kumar, Abigail See, Swarat Chaudhuri, George Holland, Alex Davies, Sebastian Nowozin, Pushmeet Kohli and Matej Balog* Google DeepMind ,16 May, 2025

2) S I T U AT I O N A L AWA R E N E S S  The Decade Ahead, Leopold Aschenbrenner, June 2024

Copyright © 2025 Toshifumi Kuga. All right reserved

Notice: ToshiStats Co., Ltd. and I do not accept any responsibility or liability for loss or damage occasioned to any person or property through using materials, instructions, methods, algorithms or ideas contained herein, or acting or refraining from acting as a result of such use. ToshiStats Co., Ltd. and I expressly disclaim all implied warranties, including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. There will be no duty on ToshiStats Co., Ltd. and me to correct any errors or defects in the codes, the software and the contents.

We Built a Customer Complaint Classification Agent with Google's New AI Agent Framework "ADK"

On April 9th, Google released a new AI agent framework called "ADK" (Agent Development Kit). It's an excellent framework that incorporates the latest multi-agent technology while also being user-friendly, allowing implementation in about 100 lines of code. At Toshi Stats, we decided to immediately try creating a customer complaint classification agent using ADK.

1. Customer Complaint Classification Task

Banks receive various complaints from customers. We want to classify these complaints based on which financial product they concern. Specifically, this is a 6-class classification task where we choose one from the following six financial products. Random guessing would yield an accuracy below 20%.

Financial products to classify

2. Implementation with ADK

Now, let's move on to the ADK implementation. We'll defer to the official documentation for file structure and other details, and instead show how to write the AI agent below. The "instruction" part is particularly important; writing this carefully improves accuracy. This is what's known as a "prompt". In this case, we've specifically instructed it to select only one from the six financial products. Other parts are largely unchanged from what's described in tutorials, etc. It has a simple structure, and I believe it's not difficult once you get used to it.

AI agent implementation with ADK

3. Accuracy Verification

We created six classification examples and had the AI agent provide answers. In the first example, I believe it answered "student loan" based on the word "graduation." It's quite smart! Also, in the second example, it's presumed to have answered "mortgage " based on the phrase "prime location." ADK has a built-in UI like the one shown below, which is very convenient for testing immediately after implementation.

ADK user interface

The generative AI model used this time, Google's "gemini-2.5-flash-04-17," is highly capable. When tasked with a 6-class classification problem using 100 actual customer complaints received by a bank, it typically achieves an accuracy of over 80%. For simple examples like the ones above, it wouldn't be surprising if it achieved 100% accuracy.

So, what did you think? This was our first time covering ADK, but I feel it will become popular due to its high performance and ease of use. Combined with A2A(2), which was announced by Google around the same time, I believe use cases will continue to increase. We're excited to see what comes next! At Toshi Stats, we will continue to build even more advanced AI agents with ADK. Stay tuned!

1) Agent Development Kit,  Google, April 9th, 2025
2) Agent2Agent.  Google, April 9th, 2025

Notice: ToshiStats Co., Ltd. and I do not accept any responsibility or liability for loss or damage occasioned to any person or property through using materials, instructions, methods, algorithms or ideas contained herein, or acting or refraining from acting as a result of such use. ToshiStats Co., Ltd. and I expressly disclaim all implied warranties, including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. There will be no duty on ToshiStats Co., Ltd. and me to correct any errors or defects in the codes and the software.